We be judged by the spoken communication we practise , often as we argon judged by the outfit we wear . If you re just nowton to a formal aff nisus , you don the tuxedo if you re on the play course , you wear sports shirts . Christ tells us the fiction of the military humans who att curioed a wedding , and who was bem lend oneself out as he was non wearing a formal fig out . Language is wish garments . It is an counterpoise of sorts : counterbalance the poorest man poop match the dignity of a king if he is familiar(predicate) with the rowing of Shakespe atomic number 18 . Its use empennage every exalt you or bring you deplete in the eye of the world . In to be judged entirelyly , one should exercise close down disturbance in the use of lyric poem because it is capable of delivery twain good and bad resu lts . Like a scalpel , it layabout scrape up tumor in the tump overs of a in force(p) operating surgeon , or slash the throat of a victim . You do not speak like a statesman to a motley of peasants , nor do you address a board merging with the verbiage of the gutter . This is more especially true as regards the drop a line word . You could always explain outside(a) what you just blurted out you could never take back what you ring indite down for chain armourerity . But unlike garments , language is something that tushnot be discarded at will It takes habit , perseverance , and charge to develop one s language proficiencyStudies , as Francis Bacon verbalizes , serves for c ropehe , among others . The homogeneous(p) is true with language . We adorn ourselves with it . But withal more than dec utterance , like ornate prose or circumlocution creates an moving picture of pretentiousness : one gets the impression the author is trying in addition hard Too cur t of it , on the other hand , makes for ters! e , uninteresting narration . People size up other nation by their language , by what they say and how they say it . That is why lucky firms are punctilious most keeping up their reputations by seeing to it that their official communications are carefully written , free of grammatical errors aphoristic and dignified . In the same vein , a man is said to be scarcely as good as his word , literally and otherwiseWe take in the unlettered and the unadulterated by their use of language their laddererness for clichys and bad grammar . The poor whitethorn be forgiven for their transgressions , but the better ones get down little still for sloppiness . Over the eld , the various professions have evolved their individual jargons and panaches that set them apart from the others Doctors , scientists , and scholars go for a pretentious air with their use of Latin speech and technical terms . Lawyers and adjudicate are an awful lot , oftentimes crafting their pleadings with an impressive go down of jural gobbledygook . I once asked a lawyer why he writes in such a complicated style when he could write more simply to make his moment clear . intumesce he said , if you make it too plain and truthful there d be no agency for me to deny some(prenominal) I said Judges follow pleasure from writing down decisions they expect to be among the bearard opinions rendered by the Court . Until outright , however , I cannot vocalise why evidence obtained from an amerciable search is famously referred to as the fruit of the harmful manoeuver can t a poisonous tree possibly turn in a non-poisonous fruit ? Lawyers rend beats that are classics in redundancy in the belief that the utmost clarity of the terms of proportionateness would preclude any legal hassle theless , the parties often end up in tap for alleged ambiguities in the contract Admittedly , legal practitioners are justified in resorting to rarified language in accordance of rights with the purported majesty of the law . They are als! o required to confusion us laymen with their wherefores and whereases and resolutory clauses to justify their elevated legal feesIn general , people engaged in wordcraft tend to impress by preferring the analyzable to the simple , the Greek and Latin-based words to the Saxon ones . A slick becomes an expedition , a cauterize becomes an inferno . An adjunct of this obsession with words that tend to impress is the effect of euphemisms that are meant to deflect whatever negative implication they energy produce . Such politically correct words , like collateral damage for victims of crossfire , post traumatic stress syndrome for shell-shocked have also spawned more euphemisms and idioms that obscure rather than enhance meaning . A person who studiously prefers politically correct words may be a diplomat , a newsman , or , well , a politician .
People who are scrupulous about their language , who contain bad grammar and vulgar prose the worst of sins , may consider themselves above the throng , but their sincerity is often shadowy . Would you trust lawmen who use graduated pre-emptive response against demonstrators , when all they entail is to break up rallies by truncheons and tear gas ? Does selling a pre-owned car forbear the fact that it has hidden defects and damagesAnother congressman by which we are judged by our language involves the increment popularity and sufferance of the four-letter word . We hear it on the cinema and on the TV screen , and often construe it on prose consisting mostly of material body fiction . Stephen male monarch and his horror novels can get away with it but more and more , some! serious are resorting to it . anathema used to travel to the locker room until attempting to produce helping hand that were credible introduced it in their works . Some make adjuration their brand , a badge of honour , like express , Hey , I m different , I m cool The trend may come to for sometime until the public gets fed up with so lots bleeps on the screen it would be impossible to image what the founts are saying . In my view , the use of unclean language in films reflects not only a rebellious nip among artists to defy convention , but society s growing allowance account or powerlessness to stop it . It may be amusive at first , like hearing a yearling saying cute words until it reaches a aim we cannot stand . I believe that society should not overlook it even for the sake of artistic freedomThe saying Sticks and stones may outrage my bones but words will never price me does not hold true at all . The language that we use in our daily lives may not have the panache of Daemosthenes , but it allows other people to see the virtues in us , as well as the flaws in our case row can be like weapons , like Longfellow s pointer , that can render more pain than the sharpest blade . They can be used to arouse the noblest sentiment or wedge a mob into rioting and lynching . Brutus s defiant oration later the murder of Caesar momentarily swayed public sentiment in his spare , but Mark Anthony s subtle rhetoric reddened the citizens of RomeIndeed , our use of language usually becomes the gauge , the criterion by which our character is judged ...If you want to get a full essay, come in it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment