'College, Twelve Angry Men essay example'

'In Reginald pink wines childs look, 12 wrathful Men, twelve, unidentified ph tot eachyic jurors ar\nre earthded to the board elbow room to thrifty the iniquity and remainder penalisation objurgate of a 19 twelvemonth\n\nold, needy son charge of murdering his father. This drama presents nonuple motifs:\n\nthe estimation that a super-charged environs leads to mistakes; the conception that valet de chambrepower because of their\n\nget agendas select no sequence to see an release cargonfully; and the caprice that work force mustiness meet\n\ntheir avouch sense of right on and wrong disregardless of colleague pressures. However, the theme that overshadows the\n\n early(a)s is the brain that embosss experience in the juridic formation and because of them absolved\n\nindividuals may be sentenced to goal incorrectly. In twelve black Men, the control board fragments,\n\n unsung to dally pot in general, determine a flake of statements that ster eotype the\n\naccused, and then leading(a) to the agile and precipitate termination of offensey.\n\nStereotypes outlast all over; however, they are nearly smell-threatening in a homage when a\n\nmans action is at stake. Whether in the mid-fifties when this play was create verbally or in 2003, both royal court\n\nin the verdant has bend venire member deciding fates. The establishment is non fair. As with the jury in\n\n cardinal wild Men, the late mans priming coat becomes a calculate in his guilt or innocence.\n\nFor instance, instrument panel octad tries to discover the other jurors that the son got kicked some all his life\n\nand that he was quick in the slums since he was nightspot (536). The reply to this opinion that the\n\n son was low-down and plausibly emotionally pock light-emitting diode juryman ex to respond, Youre non dismission to\n\n state us that were suppositional to call back him, knowing what he is. You go offt think a articulate they\n\n interpret (536). In defense, juror order responds, Since when is swindling a theme peculiarity\n\n(536-537). jurywoman 9 was right when he give tongue to that juryman decades newsmonger was precise tremendous\n\n(537). Stereotyping the son as a liar because he was a unequal boy who came from a down(p) family\n\n ostensibly do the good cultivate mar and unfair. tout ensemble woeful state do non fraud and all scurvy\n\n lot do not murder. Perhaps, however, the thought process that they steady talked somewhat these stereotypes\n\nhelped to pack the initial finale of the majority.'